NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile und AMD Radeon R9 M390X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:735 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 1569.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Etwa 25% höhere Leitungssysteme: 2560 vs 2048
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9962 vs 3597
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 435
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56966 vs 22044
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 64.199
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1284.053
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 5.881
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 78.169
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 312.822
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 6508
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 6508
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 vs 2048 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 vs 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56966 vs 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 6508 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Etwa 27% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3708
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3355
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3708
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3355
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56966 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 24690 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
Codename | GA106 | Amethyst |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 267 | 303 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 723 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 5,000 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,961 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore |