NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Environ 54% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 54% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1664
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 214.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 versus 9640
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 versus 28498
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 105.107
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 1225.96
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 8.737
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 35.714
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 490.688
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 versus 11499
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 versus 11499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s versus 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1664 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 versus 9640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 versus 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 versus 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 versus 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 versus 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 versus 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 versus 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 versus 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 versus 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 493
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 493 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GM204 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 272 | 371 |
| Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 145.2 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
