NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 1332.1x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 54% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 9640
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 vs 28498
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 105.107
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1225.96
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 8.737
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 35.714
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 490.688
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 11499
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 11499
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1664 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 vs 9640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 vs 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 493 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | GM204 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 371 |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
