NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Etwa 75% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Etwa 75% höhere Texturfüllrate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 2082.931
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 134.68
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 599.217
| Spezifikationen | |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 599.217 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Etwa 27% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10129 vs 9899
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 vs 486
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57800 vs 56580
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 vs 202.984
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 12750
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 12750
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10129 vs 9899 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 vs 486 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57800 vs 56580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 vs 202.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 vs 16.498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9899 | 10129 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56580 | 57800 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 229.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2082.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 16.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 134.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 599.217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 16098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5443 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
| Codename | GA106 | GA106 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 283 | 264 |
| Startdatum | 11 May 2021 | |
| Typ | Laptop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
| Formfaktor | IGP | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 192 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile mit anderen
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
