AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro Duo und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- 65x mehr Texturfüllrate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2x 4096 vs 512
- 14.7x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 8x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 100x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8299 vs 3337
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 515
- 6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55512 vs 9306
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 141.474 vs 34.239
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 639.427
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.132 vs 2.341
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 32
- 11.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 vs 69.814
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10141 vs 4498
- 11.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3346
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10141 vs 4498
- 11.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3346
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 26 April 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Texturfüllrate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2x 4096 vs 512 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 vs 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 vs 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 vs 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 vs 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 vs 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 vs 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3346 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 6.4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 55 Watt vs 350 Watt
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1050 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Codename | Capsaicin | GM107 |
| Design | reference | |
| Startdatum | 26 April 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1,499 | $119 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 192 | 724 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $849 | $150.99 |
| Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.05 | 27.54 |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 128 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2x 8,192 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 2x 4096 | 512 |
| Texturfüllrate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 8,900 million | 1,870 million |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz | |
| CUDA-Kerne | 512 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der Eyefinity-Displays | 6 | |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 277 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 3x 8-pin | None |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 512 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 2x 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Speichertyp | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche AMD Radeon Pro Duo mit anderen
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
