AMD Radeon Pro Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 65x more texture fill rate: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 512
- 14.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 100x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8299 vs 3337
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 515
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55512 vs 9306
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 141.474 vs 34.239
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 639.427
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.132 vs 2.341
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 32
- 11.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 vs 69.814
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10141 vs 4498
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3346
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10141 vs 4498
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 April 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 vs 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 vs 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 350 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 | 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Capsaicin | GM107 |
Design | reference | |
Launch date | 26 April 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | $119 |
Place in performance rating | 192 | 724 |
Price now | $849 | $150.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | 27.54 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 1,870 million |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 277 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |