AMD Radeon Pro Duo versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 512
- 14.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 8,192 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- 100x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8299 versus 3337
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 versus 515
- 6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55512 versus 9306
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 141.474 versus 34.239
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 639.427
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.132 versus 2.341
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 versus 32
- 11.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 versus 69.814
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10141 versus 4498
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3346
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10141 versus 4498
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3346
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 versus 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 versus 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 versus 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 6.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 350 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Capsaicin | GM107 |
| Conception | reference | |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | $119 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 192 | 724 |
| Prix maintenant | $849 | $150.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | 27.54 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 8,900 million | 1,870 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 277 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 3x 8-pin | None |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 4096 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Duo avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
