NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti und NVIDIA TITAN RTX Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- 5.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 50 Watt vs 280 Watt
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3707
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3353
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3707
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3353
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 vs 18 December 2018 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3353 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Etwa 19% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- 4.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4608 vs 1024
- 9.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 7539
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 vs 380
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 41907
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 12180
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 12180
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3794 vs 3656
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 4608 vs 1024 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 vs 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 vs 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 41907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 12180 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 vs 3656 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 20362 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 840 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 138072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 25820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 25820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 3794 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU117 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 2 Apr 2020 | 18 December 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 267 | 109 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1485 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1350 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | 280 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 3 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 2x 8-pin |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 192.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |