NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 1041.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s
- Etwa 2% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 220 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 16357
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 921
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 77476
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 252.601
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 24.769
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1322.129
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 14699
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3720
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3369
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 14699
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3720
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3369
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 2134
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 2134 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 7% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Etwa 10% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 182.055
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 182.055 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 2134 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | RDNA |
Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $400 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 162 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 10.3 B |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |