NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 1041.3x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 16357
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 921
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 77476
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 252.601
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 3949.565
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 24.769
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1322.129
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 14699
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3720
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3369
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 14699
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3720
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3369
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 2134
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 2134 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 182.055
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 182.055 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 2134 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $400 |
Place in performance rating | 44 | 162 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |