NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 16357
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 921
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 77476
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 252.601
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 3949.565
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 24.769
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1322.129
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 14699
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3720
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3369
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 14699
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3720
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3369
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 2134
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 7 July 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 2134 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 182.055
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 182.055 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 2134 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $400 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 162 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |