AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 8.039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 21 January 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 vs 8.039 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 1033
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 210
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 2802
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2689
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 720 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 vs 1033 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1033 | 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 8.039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Mars | Juniper |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 21 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1045 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |