AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.502 vs 8.039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 vs 1043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 vs 8.039 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 211
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 2802
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2689
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | 1043 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 8.039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Mars | Juniper |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 21 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1047 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 720 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W4170M with others
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
AMDFirePro W4170M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
