AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 18.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1022 vs 668
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5884 vs 2262
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.274 vs 5.698
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 271.177 vs 175.385
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.505 vs 0.497
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.834 vs 9.27
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1064
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1589
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2716
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1064
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1589
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2716

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 620 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 200

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022 668
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	200 238
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5884 2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.274 5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	271.177 175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.505 0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.834 9.27
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 2716

Compare specifications (specs)