AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Launch date | 26 February 2013 vs 9 November 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 620 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 18.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 1022
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 200
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15182 vs 5884
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 vs 8.274
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 vs 271.177
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 1.505
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.378 vs 24.834
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.363 vs 70.596
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 1734
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2221
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 1734
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2221
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 18.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 1022 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 200 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15182 vs 5884 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 vs 8.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 vs 271.177 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 vs 1.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 vs 24.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 vs 70.596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 vs 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 vs 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1022 | 4630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 | 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Mars | GF110 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1285 | 620 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |