AMD Radeon HD 8750M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Date de sortie | 26 February 2013 versus 9 November 2010 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1544 MHz versus 620 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 49.4 billion / sec versus 18.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,581.1 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- 4.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 versus 1022
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 versus 200
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15182 versus 5884
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 versus 8.274
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 872.651 versus 271.177
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 versus 1.505
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.378 versus 24.834
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.363 versus 70.596
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 versus 1734
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2221
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 versus 1734
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2221
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1544 MHz versus 620 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.4 billion / sec versus 18.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581.1 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 versus 1022 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 versus 200 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15182 versus 5884 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 versus 8.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 versus 271.177 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 versus 1.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 versus 24.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 versus 70.596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 versus 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 versus 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1022 | 4630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 | 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 809 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Mars | GF110 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Date de sortie | 26 February 2013 | 9 November 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1285 | 620 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $289.88 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 595.2 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.6 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 192.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |