AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1059
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10229 vs 5067
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 15.905
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 438.581 vs 432.116
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 1.48
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 24.029
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 74.162
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3591
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 16 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 vs 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10229 vs 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 vs 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 vs 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 vs 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 vs 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 vs 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3591 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 402
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 402 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 | 1059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 623 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10229 | 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Mars |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 16 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 804 | 800 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 670 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |