AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
• Around 45% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2816
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 5,238 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 750 Watt
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12844 vs 7987
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 752
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64683 vs 43046
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 174.714 vs 106.585
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 1878.403
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.305 vs 9.751
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 82.208
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 511.115
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 9143
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3680
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3336
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3680
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12844 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	769 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64683 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 32085

Compare specifications (specs)