AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon R7 A360

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon R7 A360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560

AMD Radeon R7 A360

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 25% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 725 MHz
2.2x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1800 MHz
5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 608
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 223
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15826 vs 5809
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1616
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1704
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1616
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1704

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475 vs 608
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 223
Geekbench - OpenCL	15826 vs 5809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280 vs 1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 1704

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A360

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3475

608

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

223

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

15826

5809

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

1616

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

1616

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1704

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560	AMD Radeon R7 A360
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475	608
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	223
Geekbench - OpenCL	15826	5809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280	1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280	1616
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	1704

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560	AMD Radeon R7 A360
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Polaris 21	Opal
Launch date	18 April 2017	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	624	1160
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	907 MHz	725 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops	864.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	384
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s	27 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,040 million
Boost clock speed		825 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0