AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 vs 1749
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 368
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9694 vs 4493
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 vs 12.582
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 vs 364.463
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 vs 1.254
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 18.386
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 23.499
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 vs 2663
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 vs 2663
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3478
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 27 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 vs 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 65 Watt
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK106 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 764 | 1003 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |