AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 835 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 3984
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 22 March 2012 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 835 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 3984 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1094 vs 1047
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1094 vs 1047
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1019
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1019
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3176 vs 2165
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3176 vs 2165
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 195
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1434 vs 817
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1094 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1094 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3176 vs 2165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3176 vs 2165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 vs 195 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1434 vs 817 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | 3984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 3176 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 266 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 1434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.098 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.754 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Topaz | GK107 |
Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1267 | 1271 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 835 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |