AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Radeon HD 6370M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Radeon HD 6370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
  • 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
  • 4.6x better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 120 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 989 vs 276
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5641 vs 2744
  • 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 281
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1297
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1885
  • 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 281
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1297
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1885
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 December 2015 vs 26 November 2010
Texture fill rate 17.16 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 80
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops vs 120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 989 vs 276
Geekbench - OpenCL 5641 vs 2744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 vs 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775 vs 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 1885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 vs 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775 vs 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 1885

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370M

  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 161
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 620 MHz
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 401 vs 161

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6370M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
989
276
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
161
401
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5641
2744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1885
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260X AMD Radeon HD 6370M
PassMark - G3D Mark 989 276
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 401
Geekbench - OpenCL 5641 2744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 1885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 1885
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.171

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260X AMD Radeon HD 6370M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Opal Robson
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 6 December 2015 26 November 2010
Place in performance rating 1236 1238
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 715 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 620 MHz 750 MHz
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops 120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 80
Texture fill rate 17.16 GTexel / s 6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 292 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 11 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.3 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore