AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 747
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8856 vs 4032
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1019
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1668
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1019
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 vs 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 vs 4032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 207
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 207 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 | 747 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 270 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 | 4032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M265X | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Venus | Haswell GT3 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1183 | 1184 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,300 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M265X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660D
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710M
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920A
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
AMDRadeon R5 M430
AMDRadeon R9 M265X vs
AMDRadeon R7 M520
