AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 747
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8843 vs 4031
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1019
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1668
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1019
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 vs 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8843 vs 4031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 270 vs 207
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 vs 207 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 | 747 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8843 | 4031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M265X | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Venus | Haswell GT3 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1183 | 1184 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,300 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Quick Sync |