AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1807 vs 1691
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 324
• Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8200 vs 4944
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 12.449
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 455.796
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.295
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 24.566
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 28.025

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2801
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1623
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2801
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1807 1691
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	412 324
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8200 4944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3344

Compare specifications (specs)