AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 vs 247.569
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 vs 3713
• 20.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 vs 3354
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 vs 3713
• 20.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
• 5.9x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1792
• 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 15122
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 875
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 71351
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 260.061
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5472.868
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 20.421
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1152.228
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 19713
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 19713
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 8084

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15122 26815
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	875 1051
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71351 188320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	260.061 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5472.868 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.421 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.312 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1152.228 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8084 19877

Compare specifications (specs)