ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.6x more pipelines: 400 vs 112
- Around 85% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 463
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 49
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2113
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2113
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 | 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 693 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Redwood | G92 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 14 January 2010 | 29 October 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 1427 | 1399 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 112 |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 627 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5670 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6570
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
