ATI Radeon HD 5670 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 96
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 240 gflops
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 800 versus 381
- 4.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 versus 69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 400 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 240 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 800 versus 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 290 versus 69 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1249 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 28 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 12.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8210 versus 644
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 versus 2113
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 versus 2113
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1249 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 versus 644 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 versus 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 versus 2113 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 800 | 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 290 | 69 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 644 | 8210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 | 3123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 | 3123 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Redwood | GT215 |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 14 January 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1424 | 1425 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 1249 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 627 million | 727 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer ATI Radeon HD 5670 avec des autres
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 350M
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6570
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
ATIRadeon HD 5670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
