Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and AMD Radeon R3 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 3x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 361 vs 310
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 750
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 750
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 28 January 2015
Boost clock speed 800 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops vs 153.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 361 vs 310
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 vs 750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 vs 750

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 267 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • 7.1x more pipelines: 128 vs 18
  • Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1568 vs 1292
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1635
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1635
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 587 vs 470
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 587 vs 470
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 267 MHz vs 250 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 18
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1568 vs 1292
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1745 vs 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1745 vs 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 587 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 587 vs 470

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1292
1568
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
94
94
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
361
310
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
1745
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
750
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
587
Name Intel HD Graphics 505 AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL 1292 1568
PassMark - G2D Mark 94 94
PassMark - G3D Mark 361 310
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 750
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 470 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 470 587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 106.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.35
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 21.88

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 505 AMD Radeon R3 Graphics

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 Beema
Launch date 1 September 2015 28 January 2015
Place in performance rating 1532 1609
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 600 MHz
Core clock speed 250 MHz 267 MHz
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops 153.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 18 128
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s 4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 930 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 System Shared
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync