Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 548
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 194
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 13.569
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 1.009
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2264
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 3993
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 143.083
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 12.958
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 28.182
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 951
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 548
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2264

Compare specifications (specs)