Intel HD Graphics 520 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 801
• 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 693
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 3.914
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.319
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 12.627
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 27.325
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1129
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2113
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1129
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2113

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16.7x more pipelines: 400 vs 24
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 209
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 184.557 vs 143.083
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 951
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 801
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 291
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 184.557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 12.627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 27.325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2113

Compare specifications (specs)