Intel HD Graphics 520 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 524
• Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2143
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 7.844
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.958
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 9.084
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 8.335
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 817
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3044
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 817
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3044
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 152

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 209
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 154.696 vs 143.083

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 152

Compare specifications (specs)