Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 454
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 125
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 2457
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 6.51
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.577
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 11.718
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 19.855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 vs 143.083
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1462
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1462

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	864 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 125
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 2457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3325

Compare specifications (specs)