Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce 710M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 710M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 versus 454
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 versus 125
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 versus 2457
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 6.51
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 versus 0.577
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 11.718
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 19.855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 24 July 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 versus 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 versus 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 versus 2457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 6.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 versus 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 11.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 719 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 24
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 148.156 versus 143.083
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 versus 951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 1462
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 versus 951
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 1462
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 versus 143.083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 1462 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 125 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 2457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 6.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 148.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 11.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 24 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 1387 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
