Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 9 October 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 864
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 209
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 3993
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 21.852
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 143.083
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.243
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 12.958
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 vs 28.182
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1462
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 951
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1462
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 864 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 209 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 vs 3993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 vs 143.083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 vs 1.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 vs 12.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 vs 28.182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1462 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 vs 326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 2527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 7900 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK106 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 9 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1381 | 846 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 928 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |