Intel HD Graphics 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 7.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 1 GB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 9 October 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 110 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 864
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 209
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 versus 3993
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 versus 21.852
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 143.083
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 1.243
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 versus 12.958
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 versus 28.182
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 1462
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 1462
- 2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 versus 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 versus 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 versus 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 versus 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 versus 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 1462 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 7900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 9 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1381 | 846 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 520 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
