Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1734 versus 1554
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7352 versus 5772
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 18.461
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 versus 354.392
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 versus 1.125
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 versus 18.511
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 versus 41.941
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 2488
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3322
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 2488
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3322
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 versus 322
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 15 March 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 versus 1554 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7352 versus 5772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 versus 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 versus 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 versus 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 versus 322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 versus 362
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 1884
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 1884
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 versus 362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 1884 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | 1554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 375 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7352 | 5772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 15 March 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1058 | 1061 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $287.59 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 98.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |