Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 versus 346
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 28.081
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 1263
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3111
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 1263
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3111
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 4 June 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 versus 346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 28.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3111 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 720 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 28x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 48
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3216 versus 1733
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10446 versus 7361
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 465.116
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 versus 2.796
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 versus 29.115
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 versus 54.932
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2409 versus 1884
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2409 versus 1884
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3216 versus 1733 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10446 versus 7361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 465.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 versus 2.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 versus 29.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 versus 54.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 versus 1884 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1733 | 3216 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 346 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7361 | 10446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 28.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 879.575 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 2.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 40.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 99.75 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3111 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 4 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1058 | 1060 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1344 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
