Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 versus 288
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7354 versus 7107
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 8.832
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 versus 0.731
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 versus 19.952
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 versus 43.535
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 versus 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7354 versus 7107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 versus 0.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 versus 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 versus 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 48
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1994 versus 1739
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 465.116
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 2780
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 versus 1884
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 2780
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 versus 1884
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 versus 619
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 versus 1739 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 465.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 versus 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 2780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 versus 1884 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 versus 619 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 1994 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7354 | 7107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 0.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 1047 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
