Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 368
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4536 vs 4493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 vs 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4536 vs 4493 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1530
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2475
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2475
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 958
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2304
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1530 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 2663 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4536 | 4493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK106 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 808 | 1003 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
