Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
  • Around 9% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 562 vs 368
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4536 vs 4493
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 27 November 2013
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 562 vs 368
Geekbench - OpenCL 4536 vs 4493

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

  • 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1530
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2475
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2475
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 958
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 958
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2304
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1749 vs 1530
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2663 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2663 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3478 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3478 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3332 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3332 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1530
1749
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
562
368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2475
2663
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4536
4493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3332
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 1530 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark 562 368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475 2663
Geekbench - OpenCL 4536 4493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.499
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 545

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3e GK106
Launch date 5 September 2014 27 November 2013
Place in performance rating 808 1003
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $109
Price now $144.81
Value for money (0-100) 16.05

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1058 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 812.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 33.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 64 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,540 million
CUDA cores 384

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length 5.70" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.3

Memory

Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA