Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 548
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 1671
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3569 vs 1473
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 2475
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 2475
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 4507
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1577 vs 958
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1577 vs 958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1473 3569
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2475 4921
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4507 12020
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	958 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2304 1671

Compare specifications (specs)