Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 14 ans 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 42 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 16.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 versus 34.483
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3320
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3320
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 26 March 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 42 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 versus 34.483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3320 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 256
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 versus 1727
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 versus 359
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 versus 6464
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 706.104 versus 543.594
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 versus 1.995
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 versus 29.322
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 versus 2899
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3658 versus 3219
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 versus 2899
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3658 versus 3219
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 versus 256 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 versus 1727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 versus 359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 versus 6464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 versus 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 versus 1.995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 versus 29.322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 versus 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 versus 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 versus 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 versus 3219 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 4121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 26 March 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 760 | 758 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $71.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 480 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,345.0 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way, 3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 177.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |