Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
• 203.9x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 vs 13.832
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3351
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 6x more pipelines: 1536 vs 256
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3805 vs 1727
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 359
• Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12810 vs 6464
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 35.179
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 543.594
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 1.995
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 2899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 3219
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 2899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 3219
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1466 vs 641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1727 3805
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	359 421
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6464 12810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 13.832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 1466

Compare specifications (specs)