NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 598 MHz
• 8.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 33.5 billion / sec
• 9.1x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 336
• 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1526 MB
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1751
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 306
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 6467
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 15.053
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 588.645
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.72
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 52.899
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2731
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 32.988
• 10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 312
• 10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 344
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2737 1751
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 306
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10550 6467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.948 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	968.568 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.58 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.988 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.144 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 3346

Compare specifications (specs)