NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GRID K2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 319
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 18.948
- 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 344
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 312
- 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 344
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 11 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 18.948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2
- 16.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 2233
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 6869
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 297.631
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 1.427
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 15.363
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 99.125
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2970
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2970
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 vs 2233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10550 vs 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.58 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 vs 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 vs 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 vs 2970 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GRID K2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2233 | 2737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 319 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 10550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 18.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 968.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 2.58 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 32.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 114.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 312 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GRID K2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | $5,199 |
Place in performance rating | 975 | 976 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |