NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 140 Watt
• 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 6.3x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• 6.7x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 588
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 113
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 2629
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 6.448
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 155.993
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.574
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 12.2
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 27.733
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 1344
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2590
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3020
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 1344
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2590
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	588 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	113 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.448 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.993 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.574 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.2 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.733 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 3365

Compare specifications (specs)