NVIDIA GeForce 910M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 300x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 775 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- 6.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- 6.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 588
- 4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 113
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 2629
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 6.448
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 155.993
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 0.574
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 12.2
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 versus 27.733
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 1344
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 2590
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3020
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 1344
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 2590
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3020
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 588 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 2629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 6.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 155.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 12.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 versus 27.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3020 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 588 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1382 | 740 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 910M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
IntelHD Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
