NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 104 gflops
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 286 vs 136
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.26 vs 0.16
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 666
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1457
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 666
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 4 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 vs 136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 vs 0.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 vs 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 vs 1457 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 77
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1313
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.124 vs 4.992
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 vs 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1313 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 vs 4.992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1313 | 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 | 1457 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Cedar |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 4 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1558 | 1606 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 292 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
AMD Eyefinity |