NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs ATI Radeon HD 5450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 129.02 gflops vs 104 gflops
  • Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 286 vs 136
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.26 vs 0.16
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 vs 344
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 666
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1457
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 vs 344
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 666
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1457
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2011 vs 4 February 2010
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 5.9 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 129.02 gflops vs 104 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 19 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 286 vs 136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.26 vs 0.16
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 536 vs 344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1731 vs 666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2380 vs 1457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 536 vs 344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1731 vs 666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2380 vs 1457

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 77
  • Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1313
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.124 vs 4.992
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 80 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 140 vs 77
Geekbench - OpenCL 2572 vs 1313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.124 vs 4.992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
286
136
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
77
140
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1313
2572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.26
0.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.992
10.124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
536
344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1731
666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2380
1457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
536
344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1731
666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2380
1457
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark 286 136
PassMark - G2D Mark 77 140
Geekbench - OpenCL 1313 2572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.26 0.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.992 10.124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 536 344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1731 666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2380 1457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 536 344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1731 666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2380 1457
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M ATI Radeon HD 5450

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Cedar
Launch date 5 January 2011 4 February 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $59.99
Place in performance rating 1558 1606
Price now $59.99
Type Laptop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 7.54
Design ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 672 MHz 650 MHz
CUDA cores 48
Floating-point performance 129.02 gflops 104 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 80
Texture fill rate 5.9 billion / sec 5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 292 million
Boost clock speed 650 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 170 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 11
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR2
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
DirectCompute
Optimus
Verde Drivers
AMD Eyefinity