NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M versus ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and ATI Radeon HD 5450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 5.9 billion / sec versus 5.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 129.02 gflops versus 104 gflops
- Environ 58% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 286 versus 136
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.26 versus 0.16
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 versus 344
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 versus 666
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 versus 1457
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 versus 344
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 666
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 versus 1457
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 versus 4 February 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.9 billion / sec versus 5.2 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 129.02 gflops versus 104 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 versus 136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 versus 0.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 versus 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 versus 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 versus 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 versus 1457 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 80 versus 48
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 versus 77
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 versus 1313
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.124 versus 4.992
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 80 versus 48 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 versus 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 versus 1313 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 versus 4.992 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1313 | 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 | 1457 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Cedar |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 4 February 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1558 | 1606 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | 650 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Performance á point flottant | 129.02 gflops | 104 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.9 billion / sec | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 292 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
AMD Eyefinity |