NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 11.7x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 5 January 2011 vs 28 March 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 672 MHz
- 7.3x more texture fill rate: 43.2 billion / sec vs 5.9 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 432.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 769 vs 286
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 366 vs 77
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion / sec vs 5.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 769 vs 286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 vs 77 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G92 |
Launch date | 5 January 2011 | 28 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 1558 | 438 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 1688 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 128 |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | 43.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision | ||
SLI |