NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M versus AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD Radeon HD 6770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 80% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.36 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 696.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 versus 964
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.449 versus 4.817
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 versus 234.842
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 versus 0.393
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.566 versus 15.475
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 3044
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 3044
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 versus 4 January 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 696.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 versus 964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 versus 4.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 versus 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 versus 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 versus 15.475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 3044 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 versus 326
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 versus 4930
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 33.71 versus 28.025
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 versus 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 versus 4930 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 versus 28.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 | 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4930 | 8338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | 4.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | 15.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | 33.71 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK107 | Whistler |
Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 985 | 986 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 725 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |