NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
• 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
• 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1274
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 266
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4769
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 13.598
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 404.618
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.227
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 44.123
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1857
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3275
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1857
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3275

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

• 178.6x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 1274
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 266
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 4769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3341

Compare specifications (specs)